Monday 15 December 2014

Ionizing Radiation – Beginning with mining uranium

There are many different kinds of radiation: even sound waves are a form of very slow low energy radiation. Ionizing radiation is a particular class of its own; it has enough energy to break up molecules. It ionizes them, turning them into negatively and positively charged pieces of molecules (called ions).

There are several types of ionizing radiation: alpha radiation – slow-moving fat positively charged particles, beta radiation – faster moving negatively charged particles and gamma radiation – pulses of energy. X-radiation is very similar to gamma radiation but is machine-made. Neutron radiation occurs naturally only where there is uranium; only uranium spontaneously exudes neutrons.

No one disagrees that ionizing radiation is not good for living things. Breaking up molecules whether enzymes, structural proteins or genetic material requires repair - and biological repair may not always be accurate. There is a largely discredited belief that a little bit of ionizing radiation might be good for biological processes. This myth is largely propagated by supporters of the nuclear industry who seem continually to try to ease restrictions on industrial and environmental exposure. Most physicians believe in the precautionary principle; applied in this instance, less is best.

The largest proportion of an individual’s lifetime exposure, is from medical or clinical investigations. This exposure a person can, within some limits, control. Amounts of exposure to radiation from the sun, and that from flying at high altitudes is also largely under our personal control.

Background radiation is largely not under our control. Background radiation is around 3.1 mSv/yr on large areas of the Canadian Shield and in parts of the Rockies; the prairies are the lowest at around 2.1 mSv/yr. Winds from certain directions might bring higher levels of radiation. A location in India with a background radiation level of close to 5.0 mSv/yr has a definite increase in offspring with Down’s syndrome. There have been unusual anomalies documented in high numbers by physicians in the Ukraine near Chernobyl, amongst the Marshalleise Islanders, in the TRIANGLE in Kazackstan, and in the South of Iraq (exposed to excessive amounts of uranium-238). 

Uranium is really the start of the nuclear industrial chain since its unique properties made possible both the nuclear bomb and electricity from nuclear power. Its importance led to prospecting and mining, milling, transporting, refining, and enriching and thence to the end uses – bombs and nuclear power plants.

In nature, uranium appears as a black rock. The Dene people had traditions which told them to avoid the black rock. It is radioactive and contains traces of the entire uranium decay chain:
(Please note that the first bismuth in the chain should be bismuth-214 instead of bismuth-210)

Radioactive elements are continually giving off energy and as they release energy they change into another element. As this figure shows, uranium has at least fourteen decay steps between it and the stable, non-radioactive lead-208 at the end.

When uranium-238 decays to thorium-234, it gives off an alpha particle. The fat alpha particle can’t get through skin so for a long time it was not considered to be harmful. Inhaled or ingested, however, it is twenty times more destructive than any other radioactive emission.

Thorium-234, however, decays by beta particle emission. Whenever a beta particle is emitted, the atomic number goes up by one, illustrated by the positioning of the elements in the chain, and the atom becomes a new element. The new element in this decay step, protactinium-234, also decays by beta emission and becomes uranium-234.

The next series is the “alpha decay series” – the mass number going down by four with each decay step. Uranium-234 becomes thorium-230 with the release of an alpha particle and similarly, thorium-230 becomes radium-226.

Radium-226 is the first of the very energetically radioactive elements in the chain. It was discovered by Madame Curie in 1898. Because it was new and exciting and glowed in the dark, it was marketed as a cure-all and thousands of people drank radium water “for their health”. It was responsible for countless deaths because it is a bone-seeker, lodging in bones and causing cancers such as leukemias and osteosarcomas.

With a half-life of 1600 years, radium-226 becomes radon-222 which is a gas. In nature, the gas remains captured in rock for its short decay half life of three and a half days. In mine tailings, released from rock, it drifts into the atmosphere downwind as far as several thousand kilometers while it gradually becomes polonium-218 and settles onto plants and animals. Polonium is toxic to humans – like arsenic only much more so – an amount of polonium-210 no larger than the head of a pin killed the Russian spy, Litveninko.

Additionally, every decay step releases gamma radiation as well, lead-214 and bismuth-214 being the most biologically destructive.


Even prospecting can have an environmental impact. A group of people in Nova Scotia had their water supply affected when a driller went through their aquifer.  By mining uranium the surface radioactivity is affected forever. Where all of the elements in the uranium decay chain quietly went about their business of decaying in balanced synchronicity bound in granite, they are now a soup of radioactive elements that can be leached into water systems or even affect one another. They are no longer safely separated by inert granite.

Wednesday 3 December 2014

Neutrons - "Obvious lack of Knowledge"

“Obvious lack of knowledge”, that is the criticism aimed by four retired nuclear physicists who have read my book. The basis for this claim has been (in all four cases) the characterization of a neutron as being “made up of a proton and an electron”.

Is a neutron “made up of a proton and an electron”?

Neutrons are large subatomic particles. Subatomic particles can be “fundamental” or “elementary” as we once thought atoms were or “composite”, being made up of other subatomic particles.

Neutrons are composite subatomic particles, made up of elementary particles, in this case quarks and gluons. Quarks are further characterized by “flavor” – up, down, strange, charm, bottom, and top. (I am not making this up!)

Both neutrons and protons have three quarks. This number cannot change. The neutron is made up of two down quarks and one up quark and is about 0.2% more massive than a proton. Neutrons decay with an average half life of 10.3 minutes. “Decay” in neutron terms involves one of the down quarks converting to an up quark; two up quarks and one down quark makes a proton. The difference in mass is given off as an electron plus an electron antineutrino.

Neutrinos and antineutrinos were completely omitted from From Hiroshima to Fukushima to You because they have no electrical charge and apparently don’t affect living tissue. They do account for the tiny bit of energy left over when the proton and electron are formed at the decay of a neutron.

So in summary: In relatively quick succession, the average lifetime of a neutron being 10.3 minutes, the down quark becomes an up quark and the neutron becomes a proton, now making up the greater part of the original mass. With the formation of a proton, the electron plus energy is released.

Is a neutron “made up of a proton and an electron”? Technically no but that’s what we get when neutrons decay. Shucks, I should have said "effectively made up of a proton and an electron".

There is also a tendency among the retired physicists to get their shirts in knots over calling neutrons “glue that holds a nucleus together”.

(One physicist whose real issue is about nuclear power used this to harass a professor using my book as text to indicate that I know nothing about which I speak.)

Let me quote Dr. Ken Mellendorf from Illinois Central College:  “Neutrons hold the nucleus together.”  His explanation is slightly different than mine.

Protons are positively charge and normally would repel one another. At the close range of a nucleus, something called the “Strong Force” takes over – it is more powerful than the existing electrical repulsion. However, except at “absolute zero”, protons still have a tendency to be a bit uneasy and move around. They need extra holding force.

Neutrons have no electrical charge and are similarly affected by the Strong Force so they are attracted to both the protons and other neutrons. As nuclei become larger for larger atoms, more and more neutrons are required to create the force to hold the collection of protons and neutrons together.

Sounds like “glue” to me!