Monday 26 May 2014

Baby-sitting Nuclear Power in Saskatchewan?

The recent burst of opinion polls on the topic of nuclear power are merely advertising tools or the nuclear industry. Saskatchewan residents soundly defeated the Uranium Development Partnership in 2009 with a mere 12% supporting the nuclear power option. (See page 105 of The Future of Uranium Public Consultation Process (2009).

Why is this happening now?

The uranium market is flat with no recovery. Only the emerging nations of India and China – still locked in the industrial age - have planned new builds while the more developed nations, United States, Europe and even Eastern Canada are cutting back.

Why fall out of love with nuclear power? Maybe because it is a financial disaster – no nuclear power plant (NPP) has ever been built on time or remotely close to budget; or maybe it's because nuclear power plants can't get liability insurance (if they have an accident, the public pays); or maybe it's because no one knows what to do with the waste (deep geological repositories, otherwise known as “dumps,” leak, e.g. this year at Carlsbad in the US); but maybe the real reason people fall out of love with nuclear power is because it is an entirely unforgiving technology. The fuel, once used, is highly radioactive, essentially forever.

A nuclear power plant is very needy:

1. Electrical Needs

A nuclear power plant (NPP) has to be in a grid with a steady-state base load mode; it cannot respond quickly to changes in demand. Hence, they are usually situated close to large industrial or urban customers that have a consistent need for electrical energy from the grid. For a province like Saskatchewan where the population is relatively sparse and widely distributed, the current grid would have to be entirely re-designed.

A NPP is also a recipient of electricity, requiring electrical power for start-up, for ventilation, for cooling systems and for emergency procedures. The watchdog regulatory body for nuclear power, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), requires each NPP to have two completely separate electrical systems. Thus, the province would still require a separate source of electricity for nuclear power and customers when each NPP is shut down for routine maintenance.

2. Water Needs:

Water is used as a coolant in all steam-cycle power plants - coal, gas and nuclear - but only in a NPP does its absence constitute a catastrophe. IAEA regulations require each NNP to be sited next to a body of water. The source is crucial - during the heat wave in France in 2007, seventeen reactors had to reduce electrical production or shut down entirely when they were unable to obtain cool enough water.

Besides the need for water that is cold, nuclear reactors require an enormous amount of it. A typical, one-thousand-megawatt, pressurized water reactor sucks in seventy-six thousand litres of water per minute for cooling. Twenty percent of it is returned to the river or lake; the rest is either recovered or blown off in the cooling towers.

In addition to an operating supply of water, IAEA regulations require a nuclear power plant to have an emergency supply of water that can be made available at 110,000 litres per minute. For a NPP in a potential drought area such as Saskatchewan, a dam would need to be built to have a secured supply.

Each NPP has cooling ponds for “spent” fuel – rods of extremely radioactive broken bits of uranium and plutonium atoms. These Olympic-sized swimming pools must be kept filled with constantly circulating water. Water lost through evaporation must be replaced.

What about staving off climate change?

Nuclear power plants produce only electricity, only about 12 per cent of the world’s electricity which is less than 2 per cent of the world’s total energy use. They are only “green” when operating at full capacity – which they usually do not – and their operational “greenness” does not include the petroleum dependent mining, refining and enriching of uranium, its transportation, manufacture of the fuel rods, care of the waste and decommissioning.

Unforgiving? A nuclear power plant can never be fully “stopped” - the fuel rods whether partially used or “spent” must monitored forever.