Monday, 19 January 2015

Health Care and Ionizing Radiation

Definitions:

Radiation: is “the transfer of energy as electromagnetic waves or as moving particles” (Oxford English Dictionary). Examples of non-ionizing radiation include light, radio waves, microwaves, heat, electromagnetic  waves of cell phones and Wi-Fi networks.

Ionizing Radiation: radiation that has enough energy to dislodge electrons from atoms and molecules to form ions and free radicals.

Isotopes are different kinds of atoms of the same element – just as German shepherds and collies are different breeds of the same thing, dogs. They will possess the same number of protons but differ in the number of neutrons in the nucleus.

Radioisotopes are isotopes that emit radioactivity as gamma rays, beta particles or alpha particles.

Radioactive Decay:  the process whereby a radioisotope gives off energy and/or particles and becomes a different element  If the new element is also radioactive, it, too, will change into a third element. A series of these changes is called a decay chain. A commonly used radioisotope, technetium-99m, has a two step decay chain from Tc-99m to Tc-99 and then to stable ruthenium-99.  Uranium-238 (“depleted uranium” – called so only because it has no value in nuclear power plants or nuclear weapons, unlike its fissionable isotope, uranium-235) undergoes a 14 step decay chain before reaching stable lead-206.

Half-life: The length of time taken for one half of the radioactivity in a sample of an element to dissipate.  In effect, this could mean that half of the sample has become another element. For example, the half-life of caesium-131, used in radiopharmaceuticals, is 10 days so after ten days one half of the caesium has become xenon-131. Ten half-lives, 100 days, results in only 1/1024 of the original caesium-131.

Radiopharmaceuticals: this term covers a range of drugs, chemicals or elements that are chemically bound to radioisotopes.  When used for a medical examination, a radiopharmaceutical may be referred to as a tracer. As the ultimate “designer drugs”, they are designed to be absorbed by specific cells or organs in the body and may be introduced by injection, inhalation, or ingestion. The optimum radioisotope is short-lived, delivers high energy to a specific target and decays to a stable product. For example: Used for treatment of hyperthyroidism or thyroid cancer, iodine-131 delivers high energy beta radiation to the thyroid and decays with a half-life of eight days to stable xenon-131.

X-rays are short high-energy waves that are released in the form of excess energy when an electrically produced electron collides with, or has its path altered by a tungsten target. The process of production is highly controlled. Modern machines are very focussed with little scatter.

Gamma rays are very similar to x-rays in that they are also short high-energy waves but they are given off by radioisotopes during the process of radioactive decay. Radiopharmaceuticals make use of gamma radiation because they will concentrate in organs or blood which can be picked up on photographic film.

Beta particles are electrons emitted from the nucleus of an atom during decay – as a neutron changes to a proton, it emits an electron. They have poor penetrating energy but are more dangerous when inhaled or ingested. Tritium, the radioactive form of hydrogen found naturally in extremely small amounts but a common gaseous release from nuclear power plants, decays by beta emission.

Alpha particles are equivalent to the nucleus of a helium atom – two protons and two neutron. They are slow-moving and easily stopped by skin. They are considered 20x more biologically damaging than either gamma rays or beta particles when taken internally. Uranium-238 and radium-226 decay by alpha particle emission to thorium-234 and radon-222 respectively.

Electron capture: an electron from an atom’s circulating electrons is pulled into the nucleus. Gamma rays are released as a proton in the nucleus becomes a neutron; the atom becomes the next lower element in the periodic table.  Palladium-103 is one such radioisotope sometimes used for prostate cancer. Its decay product is stable rhodium-103.

Radiotherapy: the use of ionizing radiation for treatment usually of tumours.

History:

In 1895, x-rays were discovered by Wilhelm Roentgen, a professor of physics in Bavaria, when he was experimenting with electrons. He made the first x-ray immortalizing his wife’s hand and her wedding ring. Physicians were quick to jump on the bandwagon of a technology that would differentiate bones from soft tissue. The first x-ray department was opened in 1896 in Glascow, Scotland. Side effects were not far behind when, in the same year, an Austrian doctor reported that he had severely burned a patient’s back.  

Although by 1905, reddened skin was a known side-effect of x-rays, it was believed that cancer was merely a progression of the radiation dermatitis. The first regulations governing exposure were established as “tolerance levels” – if reddening of the skin didn’t occur, exposure was below the tolerance level.  While physicians experimented with their new tool, its unregulated use left such damage in its wake that, in 1936, a monument was built in Hamburg, Germany, to mark the end of this era and to commemorate the thousands of people and hundreds of medical staff who had perished as a result of x-ray exposure.

Radiotherapy was used as early as 1896 when a medical student in Chicago reported using x-rays to reduce the size of a cancerous nodule of the breast. Fifteen years of trial and error – many seriously injured patients and use of radiotherapy for everything from hair removal to plantar’s warts and cancerous tumours – passed before an Austrian physician suggested that using fractionated doses over several days would result in less tissue damage. By 1922, this was common practice. In 1930, its use for hair removal was forbidden. Exposing tumours to radium-226 or badly focussed x-rays was supplanted by cobalt-60 when its production in cyclotrons made it widely available in the 1950’s. Even so, while the patients were often cured, the side effects were lifelong scarring and erosive dermatitis.

Effects of ionizing radiation on a cell:[i]


This diagrams a simple triage of possible outcomes when ionizing radiation passes through a biological cell: no effect, death or mutation, the latter having two outcomes - if the cellular function is otherwise controlled by the body, there may be no effect but if the cell is altered enough, it may spawn a chronic disease, affect the reproduction of the cells to produce a cancer or affect the germ cells for the next generation so that there is a inherited defect.

Medical uses of radioactivity:

1)     External:
a)     X-rays – machine generated ionizing radiation.
b)     CT (CAT) scans – Computerized (or “computed”) axial tomography is a series of x-rays taken at different levels through a body part like slices of bread and computer-manipulated to form a three dimensional image.
c)     External radiotherapy – radiotherapy is generated by linear accelerators that focus high-energy x-rays at tumours preferentially destroying cancer cells. Older units targeted tumours with gamma rays from cobalt-60 but were limited by the energy that could be generated. They continue to be used in low-resource settings.

2)     Internal:
a)     Scanning materials and devices:
i)      Gallium scans – The earliest and most widely applied radiopharmaceutical was a gallium-67 salt (citrate or nitrate) making use of a short half-life of 3.26 days and ease of production in  a cyclotron. As it decays to zinc-67, it emits gamma rays which were picked up by photographic film before the advent of gamma cameras and computers. Gallium behaves like ferric iron and concentrates in areas of inflammation. It has mostly been supplanted by other tracers but the fact that it can be absorbed by both dead and alive white blood cells gives it special value in identifying places where they accumulate such as lymphomas, osteomyelitis and abscesses.
ii)     PET scans – Positron emission tomography scans show how the body works. A simple gamma camera detects gamma rays and a computer generates a three-dimensional image in contrasted colours. The most commonly used radioisotope is fluorine-18 with a half-life of 1.83 hours produced in cyclotrons close to the hospitals. It decays to stable oxygen-18.  The ease with which fluorine can be bound to sugar molecules makes it useful to examine places where rapid metabolism occurs.
iii)   SPECT scans – Single photon emission computed tomography scans use moving gamma cameras in order to provide the three-dimensional image. The image is less specific but cheaper to produce. For intracranial examination, technetium-99m is attached to exametazime, a molecule that crosses the blood-brain barrier.
iv)    MIBI scans using the radioisotope technetium-99m have special use in parathyroid and heart scans. MIBI is short for methoxyisobutylisonitrile which is picked up by actively metabolizing mitochondria. Two scans are usually performed, an early scan and one after a “wash-out” period.
v)     MUGA scans: Multi-gated acquisition scans also involve the use of technetium-99m in this case attached to a pertechnetate ion which binds to red blood cells. Typically sixteen images are taken using the contractions of the heart to trigger (gate) the pictures.

b)     Brachytherapy – (from Greek “brachys” meaning “short distance”) the radioactive source is implanted directly into or close to the tumour itself. Ideal elements for brachytherapy deliver a high dose in a short period of time minimizing the effect upon healthy cells. The first implantable radiotherapeutic materials were alpha particle emitters like radium-226.    
i)      Permanent brachytherapy: small “seeds” of the radioactive element are placed into the tumour - Iridium-192 which decays by strong gamma and beta emission is commonly used for prostate cancer but other elements, caesium-131, iodine-125 and palladium-46 have also been used.
ii)     Temporary brachytherapy: The radiopharmaceutical is delivered by catheter, needle or applicator inserted into the body cavity or interstitially. Doseages may be high, low or delivered intermittently. Iridium-192 (which decays by electron capture to platinum-192) is a radioisotope frequently used.

Putting Ionizing Radiation Exposure in Perspective[ii]:

Source of Radiation:                                      Radiation dose in mSv:             

Airport passenger scan                                  0.0001
Hand or foot x-ray (one view)                         0.005
Watching tv (4 hrs/day)                                   0.01/yr
Bitewing dental x-ray                                      0.03
Air travel: Toronto-Vancouver return               0.05
Chest x-ray (one view)                                    0.10
Nuclear medicine thyroid scan                        0.14
Dental panoramic                                            0.15
Pelvic x-ray                                                      0.7
Screening mammogram (four views)               0.7
Thoracic spine x-ray                                        1.0
Lumbar spine x-ray                                          1.5
Nuclear medicine lung scan                             2.0
Background radiation (average Cndn)             2.5
Nuclear medicine bone scan                            4.2
Nuclear cardiac diagnostic test (MIBI)            10
Abdominal CT scan                                         10
Smoking (20 cigs/day)                                     53

Hazards: 

When the ionizing radiation of x-rays or gamma rays pass through a body, no radioactivity remains in the body. A trail of damaged structural proteins, enzymes and nucleic acids marks their passage. The damage done is cumulative, the probability of genetic defects, cancers, and life-shortening effects increases over a person’s lifetime. By and large, the greatest body burden of ionizing radiation for North Americans is the result of medical diagnostic or therapeutic uses.

The medical profession is so enamoured with diagnostic and treatment using ionizing radiation that even though two researchers, Dr. Alice Stewart in the UK in the 1950’s and Dr. Rosalie Bertell in the USA in the 1960’s, established the link between a single chest x-ray on a woman in pregnancy and an increased risk of leukemia in the offspring, it was not until the 1970’s that patient shielding became standard practice and performing x-rays during pregnancy severely limited. An entirely new phase of medical excitement over technology occurred over CT scans[iv]. Given that these scans deliver in order of magnitude at least 75 times the radiation of a chest x-ray, it should be no surprise that the incidence of cancer increases with the number of CT scans.[v]

Radiotherapy using radioisotopes also has its risks.  Although the intention is to avoid irradiation of healthy cells, some will inevitably be exposed to radiation. The possibility exists that one of these cells will mutate and lead to a secondary cancer. One study estimated that 8% of secondary cancers are caused by radiotherapy.[vi] This is very difficult to calculate because the same risks present for the first cancer may still exist (for example, smoking). The risk will also vary with amounts of radiation exposure, parts of the body exposed and the age of the patient. In 2011, researchers at McGill reviewed more than eighty thousand patient charts and concluded that the risk of cancer from low-dose imaging techniques increased 3% for every 10 mSv of radiation received.[vii]

Finally, concern exists over the variety of decay products from radioisotopes used in radiopharmaceuticals. Although the tracers may decay rapidly to a stable element, their progeny may not. While fluorine-18 decays to oxygen-18 which is stable, technetium-99m decays to technetium-99 which is also radioactive with a half-life of 211,000 years.

In conclusion, ionizing radiation has literally opened the living human body to knifeless dissection but carries its own risks. It is challenging to “first do no harm”[viii] and curb our ever-increasing desire to know more about our patient’s body or disease – whether or not we can treat it.




[i] Adapted by F. Oelck from Grenier, Gilles W. (2006). Lignes Directrices Pour Le Depistage De La Contamination Et La Decontamination Des Personnes Lors D’une Urgence Nucleaire. As posted online at: www.urgencenucleaire.qc.ca/documentation/decontamination_perspdf, [May 10th, 2011].
[ii] Modified based on Society of Nuclear Medicine, “Beneficial Medical Uses of Radiation,” www.molecularimagingcentre.org/index.cfm?PageID=7083>; American Dental Association, “Oral Health Topics,” www.ada.org/2760.aspx., Neil Savage, “X-ray Body Scanners Arriving at Airports,” spectrum.ieee.org/biomedical/imaging/xray-body-scanners-arriving-at-airports.
[iii] For example, varies with elevation, surroundings (mountains of granite or flat prairies), wind and other geographic factors – such as mines, nuclear power emissions, basements (radon). 
[iv] James C. Worrall, Sadia Jama, Ian G. Stiell, “Radiation doses to emergency department patients undergoing computed tomography” Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2104;16(6):477-484 cjem-online.ca/v16/n06/p477
[v] Carina Storrs, “How Much Do CT Scans Increase the Risk of Cancer? Scientific American, 309, Issue 1, Jun 18, 2013 scientificamerican.com/article/how-much-ct-scans-increase-risk-cancer/
[vi] “Benefits of Radiotherapy Outweigh Small Increased Risk of Second cancer,” Ecancernews, 2011 ecancermedicalscience.com/news-insider-news.asp?itemid=1660
[vii] Mark J. Eisenberg, Johathan Afilalo, Patrick R. Lawler, Michal Abramhamowicz, Hugues Richard, and Louise Pilote, “Cancer Risk Related to Low-Dose Ionizing radiation from cardiac Imaging in Patients after Acute Myocardial Infarction,” Canadian Medical Association Journal 183 (March 8, 2011): 430-436.
[viii] Erroneously thought to be from the Hippocratic oath but attributed to Dr. Thomas Inman according to Wikipedia, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Inman

Monday, 15 December 2014

Ionizing Radiation – Beginning with mining uranium

There are many different kinds of radiation: even sound waves are a form of very slow low energy radiation. Ionizing radiation is a particular class of its own; it has enough energy to break up molecules. It ionizes them, turning them into negatively and positively charged pieces of molecules (called ions).

There are several types of ionizing radiation: alpha radiation – slow-moving fat positively charged particles, beta radiation – faster moving negatively charged particles and gamma radiation – pulses of energy. X-radiation is very similar to gamma radiation but is machine-made. Neutron radiation occurs naturally only where there is uranium; only uranium spontaneously exudes neutrons.

No one disagrees that ionizing radiation is not good for living things. Breaking up molecules whether enzymes, structural proteins or genetic material requires repair - and biological repair may not always be accurate. There is a largely discredited belief that a little bit of ionizing radiation might be good for biological processes. This myth is largely propagated by supporters of the nuclear industry who seem continually to try to ease restrictions on industrial and environmental exposure. Most physicians believe in the precautionary principle; applied in this instance, less is best.

The largest proportion of an individual’s lifetime exposure, is from medical or clinical investigations. This exposure a person can, within some limits, control. Amounts of exposure to radiation from the sun, and that from flying at high altitudes is also largely under our personal control.

Background radiation is largely not under our control. Background radiation is around 3.1 mSv/yr on large areas of the Canadian Shield and in parts of the Rockies; the prairies are the lowest at around 2.1 mSv/yr. Winds from certain directions might bring higher levels of radiation. A location in India with a background radiation level of close to 5.0 mSv/yr has a definite increase in offspring with Down’s syndrome. There have been unusual anomalies documented in high numbers by physicians in the Ukraine near Chernobyl, amongst the Marshalleise Islanders, in the TRIANGLE in Kazackstan, and in the South of Iraq (exposed to excessive amounts of uranium-238). 

Uranium is really the start of the nuclear industrial chain since its unique properties made possible both the nuclear bomb and electricity from nuclear power. Its importance led to prospecting and mining, milling, transporting, refining, and enriching and thence to the end uses – bombs and nuclear power plants.

In nature, uranium appears as a black rock. The Dene people had traditions which told them to avoid the black rock. It is radioactive and contains traces of the entire uranium decay chain:
(Please note that the first bismuth in the chain should be bismuth-214 instead of bismuth-210)

Radioactive elements are continually giving off energy and as they release energy they change into another element. As this figure shows, uranium has at least fourteen decay steps between it and the stable, non-radioactive lead-208 at the end.

When uranium-238 decays to thorium-234, it gives off an alpha particle. The fat alpha particle can’t get through skin so for a long time it was not considered to be harmful. Inhaled or ingested, however, it is twenty times more destructive than any other radioactive emission.

Thorium-234, however, decays by beta particle emission. Whenever a beta particle is emitted, the atomic number goes up by one, illustrated by the positioning of the elements in the chain, and the atom becomes a new element. The new element in this decay step, protactinium-234, also decays by beta emission and becomes uranium-234.

The next series is the “alpha decay series” – the mass number going down by four with each decay step. Uranium-234 becomes thorium-230 with the release of an alpha particle and similarly, thorium-230 becomes radium-226.

Radium-226 is the first of the very energetically radioactive elements in the chain. It was discovered by Madame Curie in 1898. Because it was new and exciting and glowed in the dark, it was marketed as a cure-all and thousands of people drank radium water “for their health”. It was responsible for countless deaths because it is a bone-seeker, lodging in bones and causing cancers such as leukemias and osteosarcomas.

With a half-life of 1600 years, radium-226 becomes radon-222 which is a gas. In nature, the gas remains captured in rock for its short decay half life of three and a half days. In mine tailings, released from rock, it drifts into the atmosphere downwind as far as several thousand kilometers while it gradually becomes polonium-218 and settles onto plants and animals. Polonium is toxic to humans – like arsenic only much more so – an amount of polonium-210 no larger than the head of a pin killed the Russian spy, Litveninko.

Additionally, every decay step releases gamma radiation as well, lead-214 and bismuth-214 being the most biologically destructive.


Even prospecting can have an environmental impact. A group of people in Nova Scotia had their water supply affected when a driller went through their aquifer.  By mining uranium the surface radioactivity is affected forever. Where all of the elements in the uranium decay chain quietly went about their business of decaying in balanced synchronicity bound in granite, they are now a soup of radioactive elements that can be leached into water systems or even affect one another. They are no longer safely separated by inert granite.

Wednesday, 3 December 2014

Neutrons - "Obvious lack of Knowledge"

“Obvious lack of knowledge”, that is the criticism aimed by four retired nuclear physicists who have read my book. The basis for this claim has been (in all four cases) the characterization of a neutron as being “made up of a proton and an electron”.

Is a neutron “made up of a proton and an electron”?

Neutrons are large subatomic particles. Subatomic particles can be “fundamental” or “elementary” as we once thought atoms were or “composite”, being made up of other subatomic particles.

Neutrons are composite subatomic particles, made up of elementary particles, in this case quarks and gluons. Quarks are further characterized by “flavor” – up, down, strange, charm, bottom, and top. (I am not making this up!)

Both neutrons and protons have three quarks. This number cannot change. The neutron is made up of two down quarks and one up quark and is about 0.2% more massive than a proton. Neutrons decay with an average half life of 10.3 minutes. “Decay” in neutron terms involves one of the down quarks converting to an up quark; two up quarks and one down quark makes a proton. The difference in mass is given off as an electron plus an electron antineutrino.

Neutrinos and antineutrinos were completely omitted from From Hiroshima to Fukushima to You because they have no electrical charge and apparently don’t affect living tissue. They do account for the tiny bit of energy left over when the proton and electron are formed at the decay of a neutron.

So in summary: In relatively quick succession, the average lifetime of a neutron being 10.3 minutes, the down quark becomes an up quark and the neutron becomes a proton, now making up the greater part of the original mass. With the formation of a proton, the electron plus energy is released.

Is a neutron “made up of a proton and an electron”? Technically no but that’s what we get when neutrons decay. Shucks, I should have said "effectively made up of a proton and an electron".

There is also a tendency among the retired physicists to get their shirts in knots over calling neutrons “glue that holds a nucleus together”.

(One physicist whose real issue is about nuclear power used this to harass a professor using my book as text to indicate that I know nothing about which I speak.)

Let me quote Dr. Ken Mellendorf from Illinois Central College:  “Neutrons hold the nucleus together.”  His explanation is slightly different than mine.

Protons are positively charge and normally would repel one another. At the close range of a nucleus, something called the “Strong Force” takes over – it is more powerful than the existing electrical repulsion. However, except at “absolute zero”, protons still have a tendency to be a bit uneasy and move around. They need extra holding force.

Neutrons have no electrical charge and are similarly affected by the Strong Force so they are attracted to both the protons and other neutrons. As nuclei become larger for larger atoms, more and more neutrons are required to create the force to hold the collection of protons and neutrons together.

Sounds like “glue” to me!



Monday, 20 October 2014

Being Responsible: The Sign at the End of My Lane

A sign at the end of my lane reads “No Nuclear Waste Dump Anywhere”. Since the sign was on my deck for the summer, I know what questions people ask. 
FYI background information: Nuclear waste is made up of radioactive elements. Radioactive elements decay and as they “decay” they give off both radioactive particles and energy as they become a different element. For example: radium changes into radon gas when it decays. The release of the particles (or energy) can affect cells. Special radioactive elements are used in controlled circumstances to treat cancer because it kills cells that are rapidly dividing preferentially to normal cells. However, it also kills normal cells and can cause cancer, inheritable defects and developmental abnormalities.
The Nuclear Waste Management Organization (NWMO) proposes a Deep Geological Repository (DGR) which they claim to have the ability to monitor for a century - at which time they abandon it, so, in fact, NWMO is proposing a Deep Underground Dump (DUD). 
The questions: 

First: “Why not put the waste back in the ground where it came from?” Some time ago, that would have been my question too.

Bad idea.

First: it is not the same kind of thing. The waste is hundreds of times more radioactive than the ore that was taken out of Saskatchewan. It contains some 200 or more brand new radioactive elements, some more lethal than others. While computer models predict how each element will decay (and each decay chain is known), no one really knows how the combinations will chemically or physically inter-react as they change through time. At the one existing North American underground dump, the WIPP facility in Carlsbad, intended to last “thousands of years”, no one still knows why radioactivity was released because they cannot get close enough to examine it.

Second: Packaging the stuff doesn’t work. Radiation changes things over time – the iron and/or copper that makes up the containers is constantly barraged by nuclear particles that change the elements. If an iron atom is changed into an atom of a gas, salt or even different kind of metal, the container gradually “rots”. In fact, this is reason nuclear power plants “wear out” and need “refurbishment”. 
Third: The Cost. Federal government has already spent more than $700 million on the six year long Seaborn Panel that recommended against a Deep Geological Repository. The Nuclear Waste Management Organization (NWMO) has spent millions and plans to spend millions more. And then there is the cost of building the dump site, creating the containers and shipping them across Canada – there exists already enough waste that it will take trucks driving continually a couple of hours apart for a couple of decades to get the current waste to Saskatchewan – is practically unfathomable. Virtually all of these eventually billions of dollars will come out of the public purse. Creighton is still under consideration for a DUD.
Second question: "What do you propose? Saskatchewan may as well make money from the waste?"
The Candian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility and the US Environmental Protection Agency propose that the stuff remain in the containers in which it is currently stored where it can be monitored – after the six to ten years that it spends under water until it is “cool” enough to be stored. The containers regularly assessed and breaches repaired early. The waste would be readily accessible if a technology were developed that sustainably recycled them.
The EPA called it “Rolling Stewardship”. The beauty of the plan would be that when the nuclear power plants are decommissioned, they can virtually be decommissioned on the spot! There would be jobs into the future as far as humans exist. 
We’ve created the waste, for our children and our children's children, we need to manage it responsibly.